In the drawing above (using an iPad pen and Explain Everything)
I’ve tried to demonstrate the tenuous lines of communication and relationships
that are evident in our State health system’s birthing facilities. The medical
undergraduate students traverse this netting. For educators, there are many
challenges. We are all vulnerable through our interdependence.
Zembylas (2012:8) claims that “a pedagogy of discomfort is valuable
in uncovering and questioning the deeply embedded emotional dimensions that
shape some individual and group privileges ...through daily habits and
routines” then he adds that by “problematizing these emotional habits and
routines and their attachments to … structural injustices, it is shown
that teachers and students in a posttraumatic context can begin to identify the
invisible ways in which they comply with dominant ideologies”.
When we stand in front of a class giving a lecture, we tend to
create and maintain a physical and emotional distance between us and the
students. When we engage with interactive participatory pedagogies there is a
dynamic and fluid arrangement where we as educators aim to facilitate learning rather
than teach in a didactic manner. However when we shift to the online space
inviting students to engage in critical reflection through their real life
clinical encounters, a different dynamic occurs. The comfort of distance is
disturbed. Our roles and responsibilities become less clear and less
comfortable, particularly when working with ‘troubled knowledge’.
Like the stories from women in labour wards in our State facilities
(Chadwick, Cooper and Harries 2014), students reveal many narratives of
distress. A question that sits with me as I read students’ reflective
commentaries is: how bad is bad?
Reflective commentaries have become an increasingly popular
pedagogical tool, now used in various ways and through several mediums. For
instance in Obstetrics it offers an opportunity for debriefing. Many students
have expressed the value in hearing about the experiences of their colleagues –
a sense of shifting from individual discomfort and at times trauma, to a collective
recognition for changing the normalized structural injustices that pervade
practices in our health care system.
As I, the educator and researcher, acknowledge the students’
experiences and offer support, sometimes taking matters further through the
institutional mechanisms, I sometimes sit with uncertainty struggling with the
emotional labour that accompanies my role.
How much do we support and report? Every move on and in the net has
an impact.
Chadwick, R., Cooper, D. & Harries, J. 2014. Narratives of
distress about birth in South African public maternity settings: a qualitative
study. Midwifery. 30. 862-858.
Zembylas, M. 2012. Critical pedagogy and emotion: working through
‘troubled knowledge’ in posttraumatic contexts, Critical Studies in Education.
1-14.
No comments:
Post a Comment